DA 27.
AUDIO & TEXT
To introduce DA #27:
Trump has set him to work hard for the US. Très bien.
I may do more French voice segment at this time, but not sure of it at this point.
Trump said something very shocking after seeing the wildfire burnt area in CA. It wasn’t an official statement, but a remark he made during a brief exchange with journalists.
At least on X, I though found there have been reactions with speculations. That’s about DEWs he was talking?
DEWs = Direct Energy Weapons
**
*
What is DEW? Very powerful, dangerous.
*
(Excerpt from the conversation between Grok 2 and me, made yesterday on my X account)
[ …. ]
[ Grok 2 ] :
Definition: DEWs emit energy in a directed manner without the use of a physical projectile. They can cause effects ranging from temporary disruption to permanent damage or destruction.
Types:
High-Energy Lasers (HEL): Emit focused light energy, capable of damaging or destroying targets by heating them to critical temperatures.
High-Power Microwaves (HPM): Use microwave energy to disrupt electronic systems, potentially causing damage to electronics or temporarily incapacitating them without physical destruction.
Particle Beam Weapons: Less common but involve accelerating charged or neutral particles to high speeds to interact with targets, causing physical damage.
Sonic Weapons: Use sound waves to incapacitate or disorient targets, often for non-lethal purposes like crowd control.
[ …. ]
[ Grok 2 ] :
Other Platforms:
Ground-Based Systems: These might include mobile or static installations for air defense, border security, or protecting military bases. They can house larger, more powerful DEWs with fewer constraints on power and cooling.
Naval Systems: Ships can deploy DEWs for point defense against drones, missiles, or to disable small boats. The U.S. Navy has notably tested laser systems on ships for these purposes.
Aircraft: Larger aircraft might carry DEWs for similar reasons as naval systems, providing air-to-air or air-to-ground capabilities where traditional munitions might be less effective or desirable.
Handheld or Vehicle-Mounted: For shorter-range engagements, smaller DEWs can be mounted on vehicles or even carried by soldiers, though these are typically less powerful and more for non-lethal applications or very specific uses like countering optics or electronic devices.
The choice of platform depends on the mission, the type of DEW, and the operational environment. While drones and satellites offer strategic advantages, ground, naval, and aircraft-based systems currently see more practical and widespread use due to technological readiness and operational constraints.
[ ….. ]
[ Grok 2 ] :
Hypothetical Scenario:
UAPs as Countermeasures to DEWs:
Interception: In this scenario, UAPs could be seen as advanced technological entities, whether from unknown terrestrial origins or extraterrestrial sources, equipped with technology far superior to current human capabilities. They might intercept DEW operations by either neutralizing the energy beams, absorbing or reflecting them, or even preemptively disabling DEW systems through unknown methods (like advanced EMPs, energy fields, or direct counter-energy).
Disruption of Systems: UAPs could potentially disrupt the systems that control or power DEWs. This could involve hacking into or jamming communication networks, interfering with power grids, or using unknown technology to scramble the precision guidance systems of DEWs.
Deterrence: If UAPs are observed to consistently counter or neutralize DEW actions, this might serve as a deterrent to their usage. Governments or military forces might hesitate to deploy DEWs if they know there could be an immediate and effective counteraction from these unidentified phenomena, potentially leading to a reevaluation of defense strategies.
Global Implications: If UAPs are seen as a global phenomenon, their interactions with DEWs could lead to an international consensus on limiting or banning such weapons, fearing escalation or unintended consequences from engaging with unknown entities.
Considerations:
Technology Gap: The presence of UAPs could imply a significant technological disparity, where DEWs, seen as cutting-edge from a human perspective, might be easily countered by more advanced technology.
Intent: What would be the motivation behind UAPs countering DEWs? Are they protecting themselves, humanity, or enforcing some form of cosmic law or treaty?
Political and Military Dynamics: Such interactions could drastically alter global power dynamics, military doctrines, and perhaps even lead to new forms of international cooperation or conflict.
Scientific Inquiry: The interaction would undoubtedly spur scientific interest, potentially leading to breakthroughs in understanding energy, physics, or even the nature of reality itself.
This scenario remains speculative and touches on many science fiction elements but serves as an interesting thought experiment about the implications of advanced technology and unknown entities in our skies. Remember, there's no concrete evidence linking UAPs with any specific counter-DEW activities; this is purely a creative exploration of possibilities.
(End of excerpt from the conversation between Grok 2 and me, made yesterday on my X account)
***
Most importantly, nothing is proven on a possible link between drones, DEWs, and even UAP! One can though think this and that. That is all.
The general info about DEWs must be from open sources. However, when asked usually, AIs (including Grok models) say the structural way of exchanges made between AI and a user can be considered original, thus it can be regarded as owned by the user exclusively for the ownership. As for the excerpt above, I claim my copyright for the part, Hypothetical scenario (UAPs and DEWs).
*
I would come back to the topic later in this post. But now, please appreciate Grok’s intelligence of high common sense with me. Read it again ….
Intent: What would be the motivation behind UAPs countering DEWs? Are they protecting themselves, humanity, or enforcing some form of cosmic law or treaty?
Well, we want to know more about the content of these cosmic law or treaty, do we not? Most significantly, the part “some form of…” may carry meaningful interpretations.
*
The screenshot below is from X. Similar posts by different people are found on the platform. I picked this one for its thread including lots of comments on DEWs. For the actual video clip, click on the link which I also provide.
link / click here.
*
*
Go to your X if you want to read the thread. Plus, some updates.
Yes, his name is CY whom I had made several tries to contact, with no success. CY renovated the house into 4 condos and the attic has became the living floor with separate rooms since then.
On the front of the house, there are nice touches of carpenter gothic elements, which would be though gone during the process of the repair, while I truly hope they can be kept.
********************
Petition signatures to collect for “Paul”:
That’s going on in years and years. That’s why I’ve never been able to get out. No, no, this is not domestic situations which must be dealt with by communities. Much larger, much more is the truth. Organized and systematic. Bribed and brainwashed. But, who cares? No one, because such is the progressive agenda by which their constituents have to seek injustice, very selectively for covering up the crime of the privileged, “Paul”, and his deep associates such as “Stéphanie/Stephany”. First create resentments, then set fire on is the plot.
*
And immigrant working are ….
Do I sound like this state MA is absolutely hopeless? If I truly believe that, I don’t say anything of it in this way. Do you not think so?
*
Material, material, get materials! When propagators shout so, which means …
Other notable dictum is “just a foreign episode”. This one for its meaning? This one in particular, telling a truth, I don’t know surely about it. But, in my guess from unfolding circumstances for years, It seems that I’m depicted as a woman in her agony of jealousy because of Stéphanie/Stephany who is chosen to be the author of my essays, poems, and posts online. Then who chose her as such? By this community and the very prestigious news media.
*
In the coldest morning in ice and snow, that’s the day for Stéphanie/Stephany to deliver free doughnuts and coffee to workers.
Her assertion: “I’m endorsed by them. That’s enough. Nothing else matters.”
This Stéphanie/Stephany is also saying she was raped by me? In her case in my guess, if she’s fake-lying something along those lines, she’d say more likely she knew migrant girls who were raped by me. How abominably disgusting!
The absurde unfortune for me is that in this city, there may be kids who say such lies about me if they’re told that’s to help Fathers or to get nice cars or houses for their families. Or even without any other plausibly convincing reasons for their kids’ minds.
**********************
JPN source and “Women-Say”:
"Women-Say” is my last publication which I’m regarding as one of my best pieces among the form combined with videos from external sources. When I finished the piece, I however thought of a high possibility of abuses of many kinds onto it. Particularly from JPN sources. What must have been going on is that those JPN sources already obtained their publication rights for alternated forms of Juliette Masch Writes publications. How come, such things? Probably easily. Especially if they’ve been already doing ever since the launch of Juliette Masch Writes.
The essential code names are, again: Shiba/Shiva (for all psychopathic acts and lies), Keiko or/and Kyoko (for my exegetic essays in French). All other opinion pieces and all notes at Notes section must have been taken by JPN men in the JPN publishing industry, including the one who can get access to my official documents and childhood photos along with my family’s photos with no difficulties.
Additionally and most likely, JPN comic mass media (this is the crucial JPN source abusing me as the author) would need to be noted. The order may though come from “Paul” with considerable funds. The idea runs on strategic consistency of vulgarity to negate completely the artistically inspirational value of my writings, compositional talent, and more. The plan works perfectly well, because there is a solidly positive receptivity as in their subscribers who are anyway against me whatever I do and however much I prove my authorship. The scheme has almost a mathematical ratio. The more I produce good stuff, the more they can find the receptive audience for their abusive versions of my works.
*
The code name JPN treats me as if I were their disponible and disposable toy of the culture.
(The sirens you heard were from outside)
*
Who are then those who have positive receptivity when my publications are abused?
No, that’s not racism (if so, only partially). Nor misogyny (if so, only partly). Nor anti-Asians specifically (the fact is the opposite as AAPI equivalent are opposing me).
The third one is the matter in addition to racially non-categorical people. They are the degree holders of BA in literature or MFA in creative writings; young fathers who’re now realizing they got missteps in the progressive ideology, but it’s, alas, too late; Church goers who can’t accept a foreign born Asian exposing a self to American norms like I do; Some conservatives, if not certain number of them; Confused teens and kids. Actually, there are more. But let me stop the list. Oh, how about Alt-Rights? I’m too white by my ethic standards can be a ultimate offense for them besides what I can do.
*
I’m a low diploma holder? My family background is too humble? My life is too unusual? Then, what do they like, instead? Lies and slanders to push me down?
What do they like more? A white woman begs them for a help to switch my authorship onto her? Here comes the code name …. you know what.
*
A figure in a horror film. Who?
I don’t need her annotations nor any from JPN sources. Sad, very sad to imagine how “Women-Say” must have already been fully abused. That is a good piece as said above and it’s completed with no need to be extended. Plainly and persistently taking my advantages, those JPN sources may be understood as representing an aspect of modern JPN. I wonder whether the Trump administration could consider limiting the culture ties with JPN, by moving toward gradual cuts. Investments in economy would suffice for the US.
*********************
“Women-Say” link:
link / click for your visit or your re-visit if you have kindly and already been familiar with it. Thank you.
**********************
Closing: simple and bilingual.
**
DA 27. by Juliette Masch (1/27)