DA 24.
AUDIO & TEXT: Israel-Hamas ceasefire; Jeffrey Sachs; Igonorantia Asserciones whose submissions to NYT are envied and stolen; The more I prove my truth, the more fakes erupt with higher elaborations.
Introduction:
Israel-Hamas ceasefire.
There may still be viewpoints of convergence. The common view though would be said that Trump made a decisive impact. Apparently, it seems to be interpreted or analyzed as the power politics. I’ve been consistently holding my very critical opinion on Biden, regarding this war since the Oct. 7 attack on Israel by Hamas in addition to many other matters. At the same time, I’m not bold enough to assert that the Biden administration had done nothing for the peace deal. However, Biden is the one who can get the credit from their agreement on ceasefire, especially at this timing? I would say that it could be a typical move of liberals, lefts, and progressive whom I know (in my very limited experience, okay, let me say). Which means they see good things which they like, then they decide and say they’ve done those as all good things ought to be their credits as their persistent mottos. But, according to what? Basically, by their ideologically beautiful social justice theories on the base in my guess, because liberals must be always morally superior, smarter, with … I don’t know.. but more money and powers from multiple directions, maybe?
*
“Trump and the Israel-Hamas Hostage Deal” by The Editorial Board (WSJ; 1/15) : link/click
“Which President Will Get Credit for a Gaza Cease-fire” by Michael R Gordon and Alexander Ward (WSJ; 1/15) : link/click
**
*
I’ve been quickly going through my notes to find out suitable ones on the issue to support my saying of Biden criticism which I’ve held since Oct. 7. It’s not easy to choose one or two, because there are many I’ve published, not only on Notes section, but also at Juliette Masch Writes publications.
So, tentatively I selected one below:
*
(Note on Sep 3, 2024 : excerpt from Section Notes) : link to the original post
“Hamas Murders Six Hostages, Israel Is Blamed” by The Editorial board (WSJ: 9/2) can be read in full on the screenshots below.
***
My reaction: From the beginning of the war, in my humble view, Biden has never prioritized the fastest resolution (cease-fire) over the prospect of his presidential 2nd term. HIs policy has been basically lukewarm on the issue and the acuity for urgent actions have only arisen according to the electoral alerts. For me, Harris-Walz will take over the same for any foreign conflicts, when elected in November.
Yesterday, I’ve just watched the interaction (video) between Jeffrey Sachs and Tucker Carlson on the latter’s X. Sachs is a counter-pundit while being a pundit according to me. He points out that the last 30 years of the US foreign policies are continuous failures and disastrous, from Clinton to Bush to Obama to Trump to Biden, over all of which the Washington and entities of military complex industrialized the government for profits to generate from wars. Ukraine is a case, so is Gaza. Sachs suggests Trump’s 2nd term would be hopeful with this regard to rectify, for his awareness of the expansionism (such as NATO) to be the risk.
(Note excerption from Section Notes at Juliette Masch Writes)
*
Find-easy are interview videos with Jeffrey Sachs online.
*
Let me here repost (copy-paste) my reply made on 9/17 to the podcast on 9/16/24 for which Jeffrey Sachs was on the stage.
The conflictual points between two may be said as pointing equally at the unsolvable dilemma of the world, but in the reversible way. Willful or strategical concessions would produce causal effects more for the vacuum of the dominent power in arm forces and races in the view of nuclear war capacities into the actuality. No one wants to die with the whole world on the way to evaporate. Effective measures as realistic as possible must have been the argument by two profs, according to me. Either should work for the world to keep up, otherwise.
(My post (9/17/24) on X in response to The All-In Podcast on 9/16/24)
To view my original post on X : link / click
(note on the vocal segment above : No idea why I actually repeated “actually” so many times)
The image below is a screenshot I’ve just made from the podcast on X:
Jeffrey Sachs is in the sofa, the third person from the right.
*******************
NIGHT RUNS, SO DOES THE SKY:
I originally composed the poem in the mid 90’s in the last century. With a bunch of other original poems (all in English), I submitted it by postal mail to different journals in the US, UK, Ireland, and Australia. A set of poems differed according to the journal to which I submitted. The one in UK and other in Australia had kept longest my submission. Both journals gave me handwritten notes of editors with the poems went back with the provided self-addressed envelops for return. The New Yorker sent it back to me relatively quick, but with an editor’s handwritten note saying “sorry to disappoint”.
Some journals have never returned my poems despite the provided envelops with stamps for return. Some of them were Paris Review (not related to Paris France), Ohio something (I forgot, but related to Ohio U, if my memory is correct), and The Atlantic (in Boston).
*
In FW IN, on a diner occasion, I show the New Yorker’s editor memo to that ultra-motivated couple.
Then, some time after, all were gone. Gone like bye forever.
To refer to what I’m talking about : link / click DA 23.
( See the section headlined as Missing important documents)
************************
Missing record of Igonorantia Asserciones as totality in NYT:
… and the name Juliette Masch?
The chief editorial editor moved from The Atlantic to NYT. And Michiko Kakutani’s deceased father was a world famous scientist.
**********************
In sum in this post so far:
(fr)
*************************
Satanic (oh no, erase this word please, my finger just slipped. So read instead as) some sources:
What’s my conviction I’ve newly acquired? It’s simple. The more I present the evidence of my truths, the more all fakes on me erupt with the higher intensity of elaborations. My inclination toward the view? I’m tempted to say lots must be about Asians. Mostly Eastern Asians, but not excluding South Asians. In the case of the latter, lots must have been gang types. And the former? Mixtures and diversity for being included (oh, they love this one, I’m sure!). Then, for what? For ethnic justice and Asian equality, of course! Asians must have a commonly acknowledgeable identity by their ethnicity, culture, and victimhood from racism and discriminations. Such must be the idea, I understand.
***************
Bonne journée. Bye:
**
DA 24. by Juliette Masch (1/16)