DA 20.

AUDIO & TEXT

1. Bilingual greetings as usual:

*****

2. Hillary and Soros:

My initial remarks on them were assessed by Grok 2 on my account X as in the AI’s positive affirmation, while the relationship between Bill Clinton and the Soros family was stated more in unclarity than that between Hillary and Soros, according to Grok 2. Although I will not copy-paste the whole conversation with the AI here in this space; please know my push points were two.

Below is an excerpt. Basically, I hold the ownership (thus the copyrights) of the conversational content, unless Grok 2 cites specific sources in a from of quotation or notes direct links.

[ me ]

Biden gave the presidential medal of freedom to both Hillary and George Soros as if they were a set value (according to me). Can I ask your analysis of Biden's possible motivation or the Party's? I wonder whether you can form your own view on it, based on available data.

[ Grok 2 ]

Analyzing President Biden's decision to award the Presidential Medal of Freedom to both Hillary Clinton and George Soros involves considering several layers of political motivations, both personal and party-related:

Biden's Personal Motivations:

1. Recognition of Service and Influence:

   • Hillary Clinton: Biden has a long history with Clinton, from their shared time in the Senate to her role in the Obama administration where Biden was Vice President. Recognizing her with this award could be seen as an acknowledgment of her extensive public service, her role in shaping Democratic politics, and perhaps a personal gesture of respect or solidarity.

   • George Soros: Soros has been a significant financial supporter of Democratic causes, including those aligned with Biden's political career. Awarding him this honor might be perceived as gratitude for his contributions to liberal and progressive initiatives, including those that supported Biden's political campaigns.

2. Political Legacy:

   • By honoring both Clinton and Soros, Biden might be attempting to cement his own legacy within the Democratic Party, aligning himself with prominent figures who have shaped the party's direction over decades. This could also be a statement on the values he believes the Democratic Party stands for - openness, democracy, and social justice.

Party Motivations:

1. Unifying the Party:

   • The Democratic Party encompasses a wide ideological spectrum. Recognizing figures like Clinton (more centrist) and Soros (often associated with progressive causes) might be an attempt to bridge different factions within the party, showcasing a united front.

2. Signal of Ideological Commitment:

   • Awarding Soros, known for his advocacy of open societies, democracy, and human rights, alongside Clinton, sends a message about the Democratic Party's commitment to these values, potentially rallying supporters around these principles.

3. Strategic Political Messaging:

   • This act could be strategic, aiming to highlight the party's achievements and allies on the global stage, particularly in the face of criticism from the right, which often targets Soros as a symbol of liberal excess.

Analysis Based on Available Data:

• Criticism and Controversy: The decision has been met with significant criticism from conservative circles, as seen in posts on X, where it's often framed as an affront or a political misstep. This backlash might indicate Biden's or the Democratic Party's willingness to stand firm on their ideological ground, even if it provokes controversy.

• Historical Context: The Presidential Medal of Freedom has been used by presidents to reward political allies, cultural icons, and those who align with their administration's values. Biden's choices reflect a continuation of this tradition, focusing on those who have significantly influenced or supported Democratic objectives.

• Future Implications: Politically, this might signal to both supporters and detractors where Biden sees the party moving or standing - firmly behind progressive ideals, even if it means recognizing controversial figures like Soros. It could also influence future Democratic strategies, emphasizing a balance between centrist and progressive wings.

In conclusion, while the exact motivations might be multifaceted, the overarching theme seems to be a blend of personal acknowledgment, party unity, and ideological signaling. Biden's decision to honor both Clinton and Soros can be seen as an affirmation of their roles in the Democratic ecosystem, potentially at the cost of political capital with opposition groups. However, this move could also galvanize the Democratic base by showcasing a commitment to the ideals these individuals represent.

My reaction was okay, I got it. Then, I further said as follows.

[ me ]

Okay, it seems to be for The Party's publicity as well as to make propagative purposes clear more explicitly for "we won't step back by any means" against Trump, with no implication of the bipartisan unity. Can I say that?

And, the AI very reflectively answered.

[ Grok 2 ]

Yes, you can indeed say that Biden's decision to award the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Hillary Clinton and George Soros can be interpreted as:

• A statement of Democratic Party publicity: By honoring these figures, Biden reinforces the party's narrative and values, showcasing loyalty and recognition to those who have significantly contributed to Democratic causes.

• Propaganda and ideological assertion: It sends a clear message about the Democratic Party's unwillingness to "step back" on its core progressive principles, especially in the context of the political divide with Trump and the Republican Party. This act could be seen as a declaration that the Democrats will stand firm in their ideological commitments, regardless of opposition.

• No implication of bipartisan unity: Given the polarizing nature of both Clinton and Soros within the political discourse, especially among conservatives, this decision does not appear to be aimed at fostering bipartisanship. Instead, it might further delineate the ideological lines between Democrats and Republicans, emphasizing a contrast rather than unity.

This interpretation aligns with the political climate where actions are often scrutinized for their symbolic and strategic implications, particularly in the lead-up to or aftermath of significant political events or changes in leadership.

*

What made me converse with the AI, Grok 2, on this subject matter?

The whole conversation is much longer than the excerpts above. I may bring some parts in below. Again, all copyrights of the conversation belong to Juliette Masch, that’s me.

***************

3. Soros and Europe:

In the very same conversation with Grok 2 on the very same occasion of this morning (which means there was no interruption of leaving the site to return), I also posed the following question:

[ me ]

I understand George Soros and his son, Alexander, are both working on progressive causes here in the US as well as there in Europe. The Soros [family] has a vital or a viable tie to leftists in France?

Grok 2 answered as:

[ Grok 2 ]

George Soros and his son Alexander Soros have indeed been involved in supporting progressive causes both in the United States and across Europe, including France. Here's how their activities relate specifically to leftist movements in France:

• Open Society Foundations (OSF): The Soros family's primary vehicle for philanthropy is the Open Society Foundations, which supports a wide range of progressive initiatives globally. In France, OSF has funded various groups and organizations that focus on human rights, civil liberties, and social justice. For example, they've supported NGOs dealing with migrant rights, countering extremism, and promoting open societies.

• Political Influence and Meetings: There have been documented instances of Alexander Soros meeting with high-profile French political figures, suggesting a direct or indirect influence on French politics:

  • Posts on X (formerly Twitter) mention Alexander Soros meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Élysée Palace. These meetings are often highlighted by critics as evidence of influence over French politics, though the exact nature and outcomes of these meetings are not publicly detailed. [ Note: This paragraph has a direct source from which the AI or algorithms pulled the information. I, Juliette Masch, deleted the relevant image photos which followed upon the copy-paste of the excerpt.]

• Support for Progressive Policies: The Soros family's support for progressive causes can be seen in France through their backing of policies and organizations that advocate for open borders, human rights, and anti-corruption. This aligns with many leftist movements in France, which push for similar agendas.

• Controversy and Political Backlash: The Soros name has been controversial in European politics, including in France, where right-wing and far-right movements often criticize George Soros for allegedly influencing European politics to promote a "globalist" agenda. This narrative has been used by some political figures in France to mobilize their base against what they describe as external interference in national politics.

• Financial Contributions: While direct financial contributions to French political parties or candidates by the Soros family might not be as publicly detailed as their U.S. contributions, the support for French NGOs and think tanks that align with leftist ideologies is part of their broader strategy to influence progressive change.

In summary, while the Soros family does not have a direct, overt political party affiliation in France, their support for progressive causes, through funding and high-level interactions, establishes a vital connection with leftist movements there. Their activities are part of a broader global strategy to advance open society principles, which resonate with many left-leaning groups in France. However, the exact influence or impact of these connections remains subject to interpretation and often political contention.

****

Let me also insert a screenshot and the link of X post as relevant to Soros and his socio-political moves in Europe. Frontières is a French conservative media. ONG stands for Organisation Non Gouvernementale.

To view the video on X: click / here

The warning raised was that Soros openly envisions the demographic change in Europe by increased immigrations as through the open border.

***************

4. Revisiting Dash About (X) for Grok 2 Interaction:

Dash About (X) : link / click

Then, you’ll see another synchronization efforts of theirs by diligent lies and propagators roaming in downtown of the city where I live.

Then, my natural question is where those funds are coming from, with no cease. Did I tell you already? The code name “Paul” is a multi millionnaire and he has been living in a f**king life all through, ever since…. well… who knows, but my guess is ever since he was born into thoroughly corrupted power networks.

Yet, from where other never ending sources of funds are poured into the plan to annihilate Juliette Masch (that’s me) completely? The answer is obvious to the whole world, is it not?

*****************

5. Pipeline of distributions:

There are points of emphases. One: The starting point of the pipeline in Tokyo has been secured and that must be described as “ it’s anytime ready, we send you her ID docu whenever you want” situation. Here “her” means “my”, of course, do I have to say that?

Other emphasis: Codes names Stéphanie/Stephany and Jennifer have been living in their f**king lives, oh no metaphor, but most literally.

******************

6. Pipeline of mental illness fake:

The readiness and pipeline route are the same as #5 above. Essentially from Tokyo to anywhere else for the immediate use. Thus, I’m supposed to be psycho treatments forever while all of my publications and online accounts are said as controlled and in strict-joints. The blockages are though real.

The proper nouns for this pipeline of lies on me could be two. Kyorin U hospital and Inokashira mental hospital. Both are in Tokyo and relevant to the area in which I’d grown up. Then, what’s next? In my experience, what’s coming is immediate follow-up fakes backed up by new funds. The fund sources are everywhere.

*********************

7. On I-90:

That’s #4 of the theory of four impossibilities about me according to the code name “Pearson”.

Erie county is the closest to the Lake on I-90. NY high up there is so beautiful.

If you’ve never done, go to Cleveland OH to drive through on highway!

Lake effects and storm rain.

Stop on the side or go on with the storm system? Taking a chance was a risky bet. So, I thanked to God.

***********************

8. Excerpt from “Nature, Invisible”:

I am a Tokyo city girl. My family did not travel, nor did hike, so my childhood was basically concentrated in the indoor life. I did not drive much in Japan either and such a terrible driver was I when driving. My life in America made me a terrific driver, especially while traveling back and forth at many times between the Midwest and the East Coast. The part of I-90 on this route is not easy when lake effects fall and cover. More than few times, I entered the phenomena, thus into whiteout. The lake effects can make visibility near zero. The experience made me know the force and mystery of nature.

Below is also my submission to NYT by email in response to David Brooks’ column. I posted some note and remark on this on my Facebook, which however is missing from the archive. The duplication below is from my email account from which I made the submission back in 2018.

**

sam. 6 janv. 2018 15:20 [Saturday, 1/6/2018 at 3:20pm

À letters [letters@nytimes.com ]

For me, the writer obviously speaks of it as our daily conducts in any situation as well as our life itself at large. It will be truly wonderful, if one's life is surrounded by decency and civility at any given moment. For many, that would not be the case, and the writer, for that reason, would say more than ever; think like Jesus, or, act like Jesus.

That is precisely the challenge for all faithfuls. No interest in lane competitions on city roads or Interstates differs from that some crucial things really confront you. One chooses one's death, or even a violent death, for the sake of others' lives in a perspective of .... Resurrection? To me, it is difficult.

I often drive East to West, or vice versa, on Turnpike and Throughway. To catch the time, I speed up and penetrate myself into the highway autonomy. I run into white outs. Storms chased me like ghosts. On one occasion, a pair of huge cargos tried to push me between for an intimidation. Then, I am assured. If I keep the rhythm, I will ride on and can keep going. If there is anything about Jesus and highways for me, at that moment, Jesus gives me a peace.

Juliette Masch (as display name)

[ my name, street address, and phone number ]

*******

Hard rains, lake effects, heavy fogs, any of those can take my life easily if I hesitate. Along on I-90 near Erie, there should be no hurricane nor mega storm with no warning. So does one to take a chance. When I got on the road, then, realized too late to get off, too dangerous to slow down, I did go on by following tail lights in front. People help me, people harasse. Whichever. Awesome to see the elephant mom in fury for her baby not to be taken. Where did it go? that crocodile, losing and hungry. I press it to accelerate. Check the brake, is it okay working? Surely fine, all should be. I look at the rare view. I see dark clouds, stormy. Is it coming to catch me? Did it hurt you, baby, that little tire missing the course and hit you? Nature, invisible, blinds my view. Nature, invisible, keeps zoo animals in their sweet and wild dreams. Nature, invisible, be merciful. Bestow your grace to our world for all lives.

(excerpt from “Nature, Invisible” at Juliette Masch Writes)

************************

9. Closing - (I’m stuck again!)

**

DA 20. by Juliette Masch (1/5)